United Development Corp. v. City of Mill Creek
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtEllington, J.
The principal developer of Mill Creek challenges the City’s imposition of mitigation fees and other conditions for a recent subdivision. We agree with the superior court that mitigation fees for impacts on traffic and public parks were justified, that the City is not required to quantify and account for the effect of private recreational facilities in determining public park impacts, and that the developer cannot be required to make improvements to a road drainage system because the subdivision will have no impact on drainage at that location. We therefore affirm the superior court in all…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Presbytery of Seattle v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1990
- Guimont v. ClarkeWashington Supreme Court · 1993
- Hilltop Terrace Homeowner's Ass'n v. Island CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1995
- Eastlake Community Council v. Roanoke Associates, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1973
- Trimen Development Co. v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1994
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Isla Verde International Holdings, Inc. v. City of CamasWashington Supreme Court · 2002
- Citizens' Alliance for Property Rights v. SimsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
- North Pacific Union Conference Ass'n v. Clark CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003
- NORTH PACIFIC UNION CONFERENCE ASSOCIATION OF SEVENTH-DAY ADVENTISTS v. Clark CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003
- City of Medina v. T-MOBILE USA, INC.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2004
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.