LaFranchi v. City of Santa Rosa
California Supreme Court
Edward T. Koford, City Attorney, for Respondents.
1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.
This is an action for declaratory relief instituted for the purpose of testing the validity of Ordinance No. 473 of the City of Santa Rosa. The appeal is taken by the plaintiff from a judgment of dismissal entered upon an order sustaining a demurrer to the complaint without leave to amend. Ordinance No. 473 provides for the amendment of an existing ordinance by the addition of a new section, to be numbered G/^, reading: “It shall be unlawful for any person to sell, offer for sale, distribute or have in his possession for sale or distribution within the City of Santa Rosa, any milk intended…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- In Re HoffmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- Ex Parte FrankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1878
- In Re IversonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
- Matter of Application of HinesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917
- State v. HoytSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1929
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Abbott v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
- California Water & Telephone Co. v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
- Hoyt v. Board of Civil Service CommissionersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Davis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1944
- Natural Milk Producers Ass'n v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.