Legal Opinion

Helvestine v. Helvestine

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided March 15, 1937No. 6756PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROBB, Associate Justice.

Appeal from that portion of a decree in the Supreme Court of the District (now District Court of the United States for the District of Columbia) dismissing appellant’s cross-bill, praying for a divorce a vinculo and for general relief, on the ground that a divorce a mensa et thoro could not be' awarded without a specific prayer therefor. The parties will be designated as plaintiff and defendant.

On May 13, 1935, plaintiff, Pauline Helvestine, filed her bill charging her husband (defendant) with cruelty, drunkenness, and desertion, and seeking a decree of limited…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Tayloe v. Merchants' Fire Ins. Co. of BaltimoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1850
  2. Tyler v. SavageSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  3. Walden v. BodleySupreme Court of the United States · 1840
  4. Lockhart v. LeedsSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  5. English, Smith, MacKall & Hoffman v. FoxallSupreme Court of the United States · 1829

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Filson v. FountainCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1948
  2. Schreiber v. SchreiberDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1958
  3. Scott v. ScottDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API