Legal Opinion

English, Smith, MacKall & Hoffman v. Foxall

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 10, 1829PublishedCited by 26 opinions

APPEAL from the circuit court of lihe county óf Washington. The appellee in these cases, is the widow of Henry Fváx-all: and the appellants in the first case, are the trustee's named in a marriage settlement, executed by Henry FoXall at the time .of his marriage .with the appellee j' and in the second, they are the trustees, executors and legatees named in the will.

Read the full summary

APPEAL from the circuit court of lihe county óf Washington. The appellee in these cases, is the widow of Henry Fváx-all: and the appellants in the first case, are the trustee's named in a marriage settlement, executed by Henry FoXall at the time .of his marriage .with the appellee j' and in the second, they are the trustees, executors and legatees named in the will. On the marriage of Henry Foxall with the appellee, in England.in 1816, a contract was entered into for; an annual income of £500.ster{ing, or $2,222.2% for the life of-Mrs Foxall; to continence at hi's death; -for her jointure,…

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Thompson

delivered the .opinion of the Court. Thbse cases come before the Coürt on appeal from the circuit court of the district of Columbia, ahd have been argued together., The first was a bill filed by Mrs Fdxall against the appellants^ as trustees in a marriage settlement contract, entered .into between her and her late husband Henry Foxall, deceased. The object of this bill was. to compel the trustees to carry into effect the marriage contract, according, to her construction of it, by separating $37,038 from the general máss of her late husband’s estate and investing the same in. stock of the…

2Cited by26 opinions

  1. Stevens v. GladdingSupreme Court of the United States · 1855
  2. Lockhart v. LeedsSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  3. Jones v. Van DorenSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  4. Texas v. HardenbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  5. Boone v. ChilesSupreme Court of the United States · 1836

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API