City of Kettering v. Baker
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCeeebkezze, J.
It is the contention of the appellant herein that R. C. 4511.191(A) provides for a mandatory administration of one of the tests described therein to any person arrested for operating a motor vehicle upon the public highawys in this state while under the influence of alcohol, and that the failure “to give the prescribed tests” is a denial of the appellant’s constitutional rights.
This section of the Revised Code is generally referred to as the implied-consent statute, and it begins with the language “ [a]ny person who operates a motor vehicle upon the public highways” and proceeds to follow…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Hoban v. RiceOhio Supreme Court · 1971
- State v. StarnesOhio Supreme Court · 1970
- State v. ReynaIdaho Supreme Court · 1968
3Cited by27 opinions
- Cline v. Ohio Bureau of Motor VehiclesOhio Supreme Court · 1991
- Albrecht v. StateWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1984
- Montano v. Superior Court Pima CountyArizona Supreme Court · 1986
- Commonwealth v. AlanoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
- State ex rel. Dollison v. ReddyOhio Supreme Court · 1978
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.