Legal Opinion

In re the Personal Restraint of Crabtree

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 14, 2000No. Nos. 67176-1; 67536-8PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGuy, C.J.

— This court granted discretionary review of orders dismissing two personal restraint petitions filed by the petitioner, Mark Crabtree. The cases have been consolidated and were initially deferred pending this court’s decision in State v. Aho.1 The Court of Appeals properly dismissed the two personal restraint petitions (PRPs); however, between the time the PRPs were dismissed and the time Crabtree petitioned for discretionary review there was an intervening change in the law which may be relevant to this case. We hold that the intervening change in the law does not constitute good cause to…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Marks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Marks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. State v. McFarlandWashington Supreme Court · 1995

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. In Re DavisWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  2. In re the Personal Restraint of DavisWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  3. In Re Personal Restraint of VanDelftWashington Supreme Court · 2006
  4. In re the Personal Restraint of VanDelftWashington Supreme Court · 2006
  5. In re the Personal Restraint of PercerWashington Supreme Court · 2003

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API