Legal Opinion
In Re Personal Restraint of VanDelft
Washington Supreme Court
Decided November 30, 2006No. 77733-1PublishedCited by 41 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
147 P.3d 573 (2006)
In the Matter of the PERSONAL RESTRAINT Petition OF William Raymond VANDELFT, Petitioner.
No. 77733-1.
Supreme Court of Washington.
Argued May 9, 2006.
Decided November 30, 2006.
Sheryl Gordon McCloud, Attorney at Law, Seattle, WA, for Petitioner.
Steven J. Tucker, Attorney at Law, Andrew J. Metts III, Spokane County Pros Offc, Spokane, WA, for Respondent.
BRIDGE, J.
¶ 1 William VanDelft was convicted of six crimes arising from five incidents in which he initiated contact with different boys and propositioned them for sex, using varying degrees of threats or violence. In this…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Griffith v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Washington v. RecuencoSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- State v. HughesWashington Supreme Court · 2005
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- People v. BlackCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. AlvaradoWashington Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. AlvaradoWashington Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. AllenTennessee Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. FloresWashington Supreme Court · 2008
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.