Legal Opinion

United States v. Certain Lands in City of Louisville

District Court, W.D. Kentucky

Decided January 4, 1935No. 1769PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DAWSON,. District Judge.

In this action and in two companion actions, numbered 1770 and 1771, the United States of America seeks to condemn certain property in the city of Louisville, Ky., for the purpose of securing fee-simple title thereto in order to erect thereon a Low-Cost Housing and Slum Clearance Project, under the provisions of the National Industrial Recovery Act (48 Stat. 195). One of the defendants whose property is sought to he condemned in this action is Edward J. Gernert. Subsequent to filing the petition the plaintiff filed its written motion, asking the court to appoint…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Home Building & Loan Assn. v. BlaisdellSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Massachusetts v. MellonSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  3. Block v. HirshSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  4. Ex Parte MilliganSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
  5. Marcus Brown Holding Co. v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1921

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Spahn v. StewartCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1937
  2. Glicken v. BradfordDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1964
  3. Staten v. Housing Authority Of The City Of PittsburghCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
  4. United States v. Certain Lands in City of Louisville, Jefferson CountyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1935
  5. Staten v. Housing AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API