Legal Opinion
Harry B. Loeb Piano Co. v. Kessler
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided May 2, 1932No. 14043PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWesterfield, J.
Plaintiff sequestered a certain RCA radio in the hands of defendant, John Kessler. Mrs. Margaret Kessler, defendant’s mother, intervened alleging that she was the owner of the radio, whereupon John Kessler moved to dissolve the sequestration on the ground that plaintiff’s petition disclosed no cause or right of action and asked for $50 as attorney’s fees.
From a judgment referring the rule to dissolve to the merits, this appeal was prosecuted.
A motion to dismiss the appeal was heretofore denied by us. Harry B. Loeb Piano Co. v. Kessler, 18 La. App. 491, 138 So. 915. The question now before us…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Barber Asphalt Paving Co. v. St. Louis Cypress Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1908
- State ex rel. Bulkley v. Whited & Wheless, Ltd.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1900
- Grapico Bottling Works v. Liquid Carbonic Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1927
- Byrd v. CooperSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1928
- Forsman v. MaceSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1903
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Beckwith MacHinery Co. v. MatthewsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1948
- Lee Const. Co. v. L. M. Ray Const. Corp.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1951
- MILCHEM, INCORPORATED v. MA Smith Well Service, Inc.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1972
- Kessler v. Harry B. Loeb Piano Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1934