Forsman v. Mace
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Appeal from Fifteenth Judicial District Court, Parish of Calcasieu; Edmund Denis Miller, Judge. Action by Neil Forsman and others against Frank Mace and others. Judgment for plaintiffs, and defendants appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtProyosty, J.
The defendants Mace and Brantley had a logging contract. They had also a logging outfit, with which they were carrying out the logging contract. They sold both to plaintiffs, the plaintiffs obligating themselves to carry out the logging contract. This sale is now sought to be annulled in the present suit.
We might as well dispose preliminarily of the question raised by plaintiffs as to whether the contract was a sale of the outfit or merely an agreement to sell it at a future time. The instrument evidencing the contract recites, in substance, as follows.-
That Frank Mace and L. S. Brantley sell…
2Cited by19 opinions
- Barber Asphalt Paving Co. v. St. Louis Cypress Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1908
- J. H. Burton Sons Co. v. MaySupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
- Overby v. BeachSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1951
- Bass v. CoupelLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1995
- Overby v. BeachSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1951
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.