Schultz v. Werelius
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtWorswick, C.J.
Does the assignee of a purchaser's interest in a real estate contract have standing to commence an action to set aside a forfeiture, when the assignment was made after the notice of intent to forfeit was recorded? The answer plainly is no. We affirm a summary judgment dismissing the action.
*452Mildred Werelius was the vendor under a real estate contract. The original purchasers assigned their interest to Daniel Snook. Snook was later convicted for operating a large amphetamine laboratory on the property. On September 6, 1988, Werelius recorded a notice of intent to forfeit the real estate…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited2 opinions
- International Commercial Collectors, Inc. v. Mazel Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1987
- Powell v. MossCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1988
3Cited by10 opinions
- Puget Sound National Bank v. Department of RevenueWashington Supreme Court · 1994
- Ur-Rahman v. Changchun Development, Ltd.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1997
- State v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1998
- State v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1998
- Kofmehl v. SteelmanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1991
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.