Legal Opinion
State v. Brown
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided August 21, 1998No. 21989-1-IIPublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSeinfeld, J.
In this breach of contract action, the trial court granted summary judgment to the State of Washington, the Cowlitz County Sheriff, and the State of Oregon (the Government) against James and Sandra Brown. The trial court found the contract between the Government and the Browns to be enforceable and ordered the Browns to specifically perform the parties’ agreement. We affirm.
Facts
The Browns sold Michael Mahoney a 20-acre parcel of *590land in Kalama, Washington, by real estate contract dated September 21, 1987. Mahoney, using the name Gary F. Reeder, agreed to pay $49,500 with $10,000 down and…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- State v. HendricksonWashington Supreme Court · 1996
- State v. HendricksonWashington Supreme Court · 1996
- Ora Lee Williams v. Walker-Thomas Furniture Company, William Thorne v. Walker-Thomas Furniture CompanyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1965
- United States v. Parcel of Rumson, NJ, LandSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Schroeder v. Fageol Motors, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1975
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Johnson v. Cash StoreCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003
- State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. AveryCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. AveryCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
- Johnson v. Cash StoreCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003
- State v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1998
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.