Legal Opinion

Kofmehl v. Steelman

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided October 3, 1991No. 10662-4-IIIPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Green, J.*

This is an action by Patrick H. Kofinehl and Linda M. Kofinehl, as sellers, to obtain specific performance of payments due under a real estate contract involving the sale of the Golden Door Motel in Spokane. The trial court concluded service by the Kofinehls of a notice of intent to declare forfeiture under RCW 61.30 constituted an election of remedies and dismissed the action. The Kofinehls appeal. We reverse and remand for trial.

*135On February 20, 1978, the Kofinehls sold the motel to Mr. and Mrs. James N. Steelman for $145,000 payable at $1,200 per month. The Steelmans were required…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Streater v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1980
  2. Board of Regents of the University v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Carpenter v. FolkertsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1981
  4. Clarke v. Equinox Holdings, Ltd.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1989
  5. Cascade Timber Co. v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1947

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Kofmehl v. SteelmanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1996
  2. Kofmehl v. SteelmanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API