Legal Opinion

In Re Groves

California Supreme Court

Decided May 13, 1960No. Crim. 6598Published

1Opinion of the Court

54 Cal.2d 154 (1960)

In re WILLIAM EDMUND GROVES, on Habeas Corpus.

Crim. No. 6598.

Supreme Court of California. In Bank.

May 13, 1960.

William O. Burt for Petitioner.

Jerome J. Bunker, City Attorney (Palm Springs), for Respondent.

TRAYNOR, J.

By petition for a writ of habeas corpus petitioner challenges his conviction of engaging in business in the city of Palm Springs without a license as required by the Palm Springs Ordinance Code. We issued an order to show cause directed to the Chief of Police of Palm Springs and ordered petitioner released on his own recognizance.

Petitioner secured a state…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. People v. ValentineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  2. In Re McVickersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  3. In Re TartarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  4. People v. RalphCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  5. People v. StuartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API