Legal Opinion

State v. Moaning

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 24, 1996No. Nos. 95-1090 and 95-1231PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStratton, J.

The issue certified to this court is whether a conviction for attempted drug abuse falls within the proscriptions of R.C. 2923.13(A)(3). We conclude that it does. Consequently, we reverse the court of appeals and hold that one who is convicted of attempted drug abuse is prohibited from acquiring, having, carrying or using a firearm or dangerous ordnance pursuant to R.C. 2923.13(A)(3).

R.C. 2923.13(A)(3) provides:

“(A) Unless relieved from disability as provided in section 2923.14 of the Revised Code, no person shall knowingly acquire, have, carry, or use any firearm or dangerous ordnance, if…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Shover v. Cordis Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1991
  2. State v. HillOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Wooster Republican Printing Co. v. City of WoosterOhio Supreme Court · 1978
  4. State v. LoftiesOhio Court of Appeals · 1991

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Summerville v. City of Forest ParkOhio Supreme Court · 2010
  2. State ex rel. Clay v. Cuyahoga Cty. Med. Examiner's Office (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2017
  3. Fisher v. HasenjagerOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Riffle v. Physicians & Surgeons Ambulance Service, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 2013
  5. In re K.J.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2014

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API