Bolding v. State

OPINION

DAVIS, Commissioner.

Appeal is taken from a conviction for robbery by firearms. Punishment was assessed by the jury at twenty-five years.

At the outset, appellant contends “the general actions of the trial court were so biased in favor of the state that the result was an unfair trial.”

Appellant directs our attention to several instances where the trial court ruled adversely to appellant as a basis for such contention.

Bias, if any, of a trial judge, standing alone, does not constitute error. Appellant could, of course, complain of an erroneous ruling made by the court as the result of…