Legal Opinion

LaSalle v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)

Decided May 21, 1996No. 07-95-0283-CRPublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOYD, Justice.

In three points of error, appellant Lorenzo Keith LaSalle challenges his conviction of aggravated sexual assault and the jury-assessed punishment of 75 years in the Institutional Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice. In those points, he contends the trial court erred in not granting his motion 1) to suppress his written confession because of failure to comply with the requirements of article 38.22 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 2) to suppress evidence derived from a warrantless search, and 3) to disqualify the 47th District Attorney’s Office.

K.C.B, the victim…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Romero v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990
  3. Allridge v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
  4. McCullough v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
  5. Lugo-Lugo v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1983

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Buchanan v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2004
  2. Wilson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2004
  3. State v. Clemmer, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1999
  4. Falcetta v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)1999
  5. Brooks v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1998

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API