Legal Opinion

Board of Commissioners v. Millikan

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 4, 1934No. Nos. 26,111, 26,112, 26,113, 26,114, 26,115, 26,116, 26,117PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRoll, C. J.

Each of the appellees in the above named cases, in June, 1928, filed their separate claims with the auditor of Marion county for refund of certain taxes paid in 1920, 1921, 1922.

The original claims filed with the county auditor were verified bills for designated totals of sums paid by the claimant on additional valuations alleged to be unlawful, without indicating whether all was paid as state, county, township, school township, city or school city taxes, or on any other account. Afterwards, upon order of court that the complaints be made more specific, each claimant filed an amended and…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Jamieson v. Indiana Natural Gas & Oil Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1891
  2. State ex rel. Clark v. Haworth, School Trustee of Monroe School TownshipIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  3. State ex rel. City of Terre Haute v. KolsemIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Kuntz v. SumptionIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Board of Commissioners v. ArmStrongIndiana Supreme Court · 1883

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. W. H. Dreves, Inc. v. Oslo School TownshipIndiana Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Kirkpatrick v. KingIndiana Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Blade Corp. v. American Drywall, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1980
  4. McDaniels v. McDanielsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1945
  5. Beiger Heritage Corp. v. MontandonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1998

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API