Legal Opinion

Attorney General Ex Rel. Director of Natural Resources v. Hallden

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided January 15, 1974No. Docket 14356PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcGregor, J.

MCLA 307.41; MSA 13.1681 provides:

"That in any of the navigable or meandered waters of this state where fish have been or hereafter may be propagated, planted or spread at the expense of the people of this state or the United States, the people shall have the right to catch fish with hook and line during such seasons and in such waters as are not otherwise prohibited by the laws of this state.”

For the purpose of enforcing public rights ere ated by the foregoing statute, plaintiffs instituted this action to permanently enjoin defendants from interfering with the passage of boaters and waders…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Lamprey v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
  2. Lorman v. BensonMichigan Supreme Court · 1860
  3. Sterling v. JacksonMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Hosko v. HoskoMichigan Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Collins v. GerhardtMichigan Supreme Court · 1926

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Ryals v. PigottMississippi Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Bott v. Natural Resources CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
  3. State v. McIlroySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1980
  4. Hitchings v. Del Rio Woods Recreation & Park DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
  5. State v. McGinleyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1988

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API