Legal Opinion

Bristol Laboratories, Inc. v. Schenley Laboratories, Inc.

District Court, S.D. Indiana

Decided September 17, 1953No. Civ. No. 3033PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STECKLER, District Judge.

The above entitled cause came on regularly for trial and the Court having duly considered the evidence, the post trial briefs filed by the parties and having heard oral arguments in support thereof; and the Court having further reviewed the exhibits covering the prior arts and being fully advised in the premises, now finds the following:

Findings of Fact

1. This action is for infringement of certain claims of Buckwalter patent 2,-507,193, duly and legally issued on May 9, 1950 to plaintiff, a New York corporation, ' as assignee, which at all times since has been sole…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. American Safety Table Co. v. SchreiberCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
  2. Coleman Company, Inc., a Corporation v. Holly Manufacturing Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1959
  3. Merck & Co. v. Chase Chemical CompanyDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1967
  4. Solex Laboratories, Inc. v. GrahamDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1958
  5. American Safety Table Company v. SchreiberCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API