Legal Opinion

Maple Flooring Manufacturers Ass'n v. United States

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 1, 1925No. 342PublishedCited by 206 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stone

By bill in equity filed March 5, 1923, the United States asked an injunction restraining the defendants, who are appellants here, from violating § 1 of the Act of Congress of July 2, 1890, entitled, “An Act to Protect Trade and Commerce Against Unlawful Restraints and Monopolies ” (c. 647, 26 Stat, 209), commonly known as the Sherman Act.

The defendants are the Maple Flooring Manufacturers Association, an unincorporated “trade association”; twenty-two corporate defendants, members of the Association, engaged in the business of selling and .shipping maple, beech and birch flooring in interstate…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Eastern States Retail Lumber Dealers' Ass'n v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  2. United States v. United States Steel CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  3. American Column & Lumber Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  4. United States v. American Linseed Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923

3Cited by206 opinions

  1. United States v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Eastman Kodak Co. v. Image Technical Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 2001
  4. United States v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
  5. United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978

201 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API