Legal Opinion

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided June 28, 1985No. C 77-586PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

DON J. YOUNG, Senior District Judge.

This action arises out of the closing of five warehouse operations of defendant, the Great Atlantic and Pacific Tea Company [“A & P”]. Under the terms of collective bargaining agreements with the unions representing the employees at these warehouses, some, but not all, of the employees received severance pay upon termination of the operations. Plaintiff, the Equal Employment Opportunities Commission [“EEOC”], claims that the 89 employees who did not receive severance pay were discriminated against because of their age, in violation of the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. ThurstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Lorillard v. PonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Thor C. LAUGESEN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. the ANACONDA COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1975

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Chrysler Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1990
  2. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.District Court, W.D. Tennessee · 1987
  3. Glenn v. General Motors Corp.District Court, N.D. Alabama · 1987
  4. Abenante v. Fulflex, Inc.District Court, D. Rhode Island · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API