Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Gordon v. Burkhardt

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided January 15, 1875PublishedCited by 6 opinions

flppeal fromMonileau Circuit Court. I. Interpleader was the proper remedy for Moniteau county. (2 Sto. Eq. Jur., §§ 806, 807; Freeland vs. Wilson, 18 Mo., 380.)

1Opinion of the CourtHough, Judge

An application for a mandamus was filed in the Moniteau Circuit Court, by the relator, C. M. Gordon, treasurer of the school board of sub-district No. 8, township 45, range 15, to compel G. A. Burkhardt, sheriff and ex-officio collector of said county, and collector of said sub-district, to pay the relator, as such treasurer, the sum of two hundred and eighty dollars and eighty-nine cents, which it was alleged said Burkhart had on the 16th day of December, 1872, as such collector, received from the Pacific Railroad as delinquent school taxes due from the said railroad to said sub-district,…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Sturdivant Bank v. Little River Drainage DistrictSupreme Court of Missouri · 1934
  2. State Ex Rel. Sharp v. KnightMissouri Court of Appeals · 1930
  3. State ex rel. Hamilton v. BrownSupreme Court of Missouri · 1903
  4. Adams v. Casey-Swasey Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1897
  5. State ex rel. Lashly v. WurdemanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1914

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API