Legal Opinion
State ex rel. Lashly v. Wurdeman
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided April 7, 1914PublishedCited by 3 opinions
Mandamus. Original Proceeding.
1Opinion of the Court
NORTON!, J.
This is a proceeding in mandamus. The alternative writ issued in virtue of the original power of this court in that behalf provided.
The relator is the prosecuting attorney of St. Louis county, duly elected and qualified. The respondent is judge of the circuit court of the same county and presides in division No. 2 of that tribunal. The question for consideration relates to, and the writ is invoked with a view of vindicating, the right of the prosecuting attorney to appear - in the circuit court and defend a suit in which the county is interested.
The relevant facts out of which the…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Warner Valley Stock Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- United States Ex Rel. Bernardin v. ButterworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Commissioners v. SellewSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Austin v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1847
- State ex rel. Morse v. BurckharttSupreme Court of Missouri · 1885
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Standefer v. EnglandMissouri Court of Appeals · 1959
- State Ex Rel. Associated Holding Co. v. City of St. JosephMissouri Court of Appeals · 1943
- State ex rel. Pettis County v. SloanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1982