Legal Opinion

Triangle Building Center v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 24, 2000PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SAYLOR, Justice.

We allowed appeal to determine whether temporary layoff of a workers’ compensation claimant from concurrent employment precludes assessment of his concurrent earnings experience within the average weekly wage calculation.

Appellant Malcom R. Linch (“Claimant”) began full-time employment at R & J Industries (“R & J”) in February of 1988, spreading and cutting materials for use in the assembly of apparel items in exchange for an hourly wage. In May of 1988, Claimant obtained part-time, hourly employment with Triangle Building Center (“Employer”), as an assistant yard…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. House v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  2. Harper & Collins v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  3. Jacobs v. Industrial CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 1995
  4. Freeman v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  5. Mengel v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Lahr Mechanical v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  2. Reifsnyder v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  3. City of Erie v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  4. Flynn v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Colpetzer v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API