Legal Opinion

Janney v. Pancoast International Ventilator Co.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania

Decided September 17, 1903No. 28PublishedCited by 3 opinions

On Motion to Punish for Contempt.

1Per curiam

This suit was brought to restrain the defendants from infringing two patents of the United States, Nos. 476,682 and 605,508. The defendants did not deny the making and selling of the patented ventilator, but made defense upon a claim of title. On final hearing it was decided that the plaintiff was entitled to the usual decree for an injunction and an account, and accordingly such decree was entered. It appears from the marshal’s return that on April 3, 1903, the injunction which was issued in pursuance of that decree was served “on Pancoast International Ventilator Company by giving a true…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Alemite Mfg. Corporation v. StaffCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1930
  2. Janney v. Pan-Coast Ventilator & Mfg. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania · 1904
  3. Diamond Drill & Mach. Co. v. Kelley Bros. & SpielmanU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania · 1904

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API