Legal Opinion

Diamond Drill & Mach. Co. v. Kelley Bros. & Spielman

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania

Decided July 8, 1904No. 49PublishedCited by 1 opinion

On rule to show cause why defendants should not be adjudged in contempt for violation of injunction against infringement of a patent.

1Opinion of the Court

ARCHBALD, District Judge.

The defendants are charged with having violated the injunction which was issued to restrain the infringement of the patent in suit, and which was served upon them January 2, 1903. The affidavits on which the rule to show cause was granted have been materially supplemented by the evidence recently taken in the proceedings before the master for an account, and a state of affairs is disclosed thereby which is decidedly damaging to the defendants, being nothing less than an attempt to overcome the adverse decision of the court by which the patent was sustained, and to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Diamond Drill & Machine Co. v. Kelly Bros.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania · 1903
  2. Janney v. Pancoast International Ventilator Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania · 1903

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Diamond Drill & Machine Co. v. Kelley Bros.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania · 1904

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API