Legal Opinion

Bangert v. Harris

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided December 14, 1982No. Civ. A. 82-0629PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

CALDWELL, District Judge.

I. Background

Before us are the following related motions in this diversity action brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332: defendant Harris’ motions to dismiss and for a more specific pleading, plaintiff’s motion to strike, and defendant Proctor’s motions for an extension of time and to join in defendant Harris’ motion. Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed his amended complaint on June 11, 1982 pursuant to the court’s order and memorandum of June 3, 1982. Service on Proctor occurred on June 24 and on Harris, on June 29. Essentially plaintiff’s cause of action is…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Don Chuy, in No. 77-1412 v. The Philadelphia Eagles Football Club (Sued as "The Philadelphia Eagles"), in No. 77-1411 and the National Football LeagueCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979
  2. Focht v. RabadaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  3. Schenkel v. MonheitSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  4. Duke & Co. v. AndersonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  5. Goldberg v. FriedrichSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Kraus v. Consolidated Rail Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1989
  2. Leonard v. Wessel (In Re Jackson)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1988
  3. Ei Bon Ee Baya Ghananee v. BlackSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  4. Gans v. GrayDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1985
  5. Arana v. KoernerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API