Legal Opinion

Baudin v. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP

District Court, M.D. Louisiana

Decided August 26, 2019No. 3:18-cv-01063Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA STANLEY P. BAUDIN NO. 18-1063 V. JUDGE SHELLY D. DICK ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP; MAG. JUDGE ERIN ASTRAZENECA LP; AND MERCK SHARP WILDER-DOOMES & DOHME CORPORATION RULING This matter is before the Court on the Motion to Dismiss1 by Defendants, AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP, AstraZeneca LP, and Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation (“Defendants”). Plaintiff, Stanley P. Baudin (“Plaintiff”), has filed an Opposition2 to which Defendants replied.3 Oral argument is not necessary. For the following reasons, the Court finds that Defendants’…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. In Re Katrina Canal Breaches LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2007

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API