Legal Opinion

Lufkin v. Lufkin

California Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1930No. Docket No. S.F. 13248PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSea Well, J.

Defendant Harry R. Lufkin appeals from an order directing him to pay to plaintiff Myrtle G. O’Neil, formerly Myrtle G. Lufkin, who procured an interlocutory decree of divorce from said defendant in 1920, the sum of $3,787.83, said sum being one-half the total amount necessarily expended by plaintiff in providing Harry R. Lufkin, Jr., the minor child of said plaintiff and defendant, with the necessaries of life since August 12, 1922, and further directing defendant to thereafter pay to plaintiff, who by the order appealed from is awarded custody of said child, the sum of $30' monthly during…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. McKay v. McKayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Jaeger v. JaegerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Levy v. LevyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
  2. Goldring v. GoldringCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  3. In Re Marriage of FordCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  4. Weinand v. WeinandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
  5. In Re Marriage of SandyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API