Legal Opinion

Wilcox v. Ryndak

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 1, 1935No. 25733PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Per curiam

The defendants in error, hereafter referred to as plaintiffs, recovered a verdict and judgment against the plaintiffs in error, hereafter referred to as defendants, in the sum of $3,955.22, for the alleged failure óf the defendants to drill a certain well or wells upon the lands involved herein. After motion for a new trial was made and overruled, the defendants appealed.

The facts of the case are substantially as follows: The lands involved herein consist of approximately 12 acres in the form of a square, located in the Oklahoma City oil field. Said tract will hereafter be referred to as the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Brewster v. Lanyon Zinc Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1905
  2. Pelham Petroleum Co. v. NorthSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  3. Eastern Oil Co. v. BeattySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  4. Goodwin v. Standard Oil Co. of LouisianaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1923
  5. Robinson v. MiracleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Indian Territory Illuminating Oil Co. v. Haynes Drilling Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
  2. Texas Consolidated Oils v. VannSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953
  3. Gerson v. Anderson-Prichard Production Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1945
  4. Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. St. Louis-S. F. R. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944
  5. Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. RockholdSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API