Wilcox v. Ryndak
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Per curiam
The defendants in error, hereafter referred to as plaintiffs, recovered a verdict and judgment against the plaintiffs in error, hereafter referred to as defendants, in the sum of $3,955.22, for the alleged failure óf the defendants to drill a certain well or wells upon the lands involved herein. After motion for a new trial was made and overruled, the defendants appealed.
The facts of the case are substantially as follows: The lands involved herein consist of approximately 12 acres in the form of a square, located in the Oklahoma City oil field. Said tract will hereafter be referred to as the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Brewster v. Lanyon Zinc Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1905
- Pelham Petroleum Co. v. NorthSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
- Eastern Oil Co. v. BeattySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
- Goodwin v. Standard Oil Co. of LouisianaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1923
- Robinson v. MiracleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Indian Territory Illuminating Oil Co. v. Haynes Drilling Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
- Texas Consolidated Oils v. VannSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953
- Gerson v. Anderson-Prichard Production Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1945
- Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. St. Louis-S. F. R. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944
- Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. RockholdSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.