Sioux Falls Pizza Co. v. Little Caesar Enterprises, Inc.
District Court, D. South Dakota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER CONCERNING CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
ROBERTO A. LANGE, District Judge.
Plaintiff Sioux Falls Pizza Company, Inc. (“Sioux Falls Pizza”) sued Defendant Little Caesar Enterprises, Inc. (“Little Caesar”) after Little Caesar gave notice that it deemed Sioux Falls Pizza not to have the right to renew its agreements to operate Little Caesar franchises beyond May 30, 2011. Sioux Falls Pizza sought *1055declaratory relief that it was entitled to renew the franchise agreements. Doc. 9. In the alternative, Sioux Falls Pizza sought a declaration that it was relieved of any duty not to…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Klapp v. United Insurance Group Agency, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 2003
- Henderson v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1999
- Meagher v. Wayne State UniversityMichigan Court of Appeals · 1997
- Port Huron Education Ass'n v. Port Huron Area School DistrictMichigan Supreme Court · 1996
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Sun Prairie v. Bell FarmsDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2020