Legal Opinion

In Re Blessen H.

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided June 30, 2005No. 1641, September Term, 2003PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BARBERA, Judge.

This appeal presents the question whether a court may declare a child in need of assistance (“CINA”) by relying on the parties’ agreed upon facts, without an on-the-record knowing and intelligent waiver by the parent of the right to a contested adjudicatory hearing. In this case, appellant, Tynetta H., was present and represented by counsel at a combined CINA adjudication and disposition hearing concerning her daughter, Blessen H. At the hearing, appellant’s counsel stated that appellant agreed to the facts contained in the CINA petition prepared by the Montgomery County…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. Stanley v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re Karl H.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
  2. In re Adoption of Jayden G.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2013
  3. In re: M.Z.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API