Legal Opinion
Gray v. United States
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided March 22, 1984No. Civ. A. 81-1386PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
THEIS, Senior District Judge.
This is an action by Robert J. Gray [Gray] to recover a tax penalty assessed against him pursuant to 26 U.S.C. § 6672 for failure to pay to the government federal employment taxes withheld from employees’ wages. Defendant United States of America [United States] has filed a counterclaim for the balance of the tax penalty levied against Gray. This case is currently before the Court on the motion of the United States for summary judgment. For the reasons that follow, this motion shall be granted.
The following facts, having not been disputed by Gray…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Robert W. Monday v. United States of America, and Third-Party v. John A. Monday, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
- Mazo v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
- Mustang Fuel Corporation, a Corporation v. Youngstown Sheet and Tube Company, an Ohio CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1975
- George D. Hartman, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1976
- Gray F. Madison, Sr., and Elizabeth B. Madison, Husband and Wife, Plaintiffs v. Deseret Livestock Company, a Utah CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1978
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Muck v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
- In Re CarterUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Kansas · 1991
- Abramson v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1985
- Neier v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1991
- Mulee v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1986
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.