Legal Opinion

Mulee v. United States

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided October 30, 1986No. 85 C 7451PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

ASPEN, District Judge:

In this civil tax case plaintiff Dennis Mulee (“Mulee”) seeks a refund of $4,731.89 he paid against an assessment of $94,639.96 by the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) pursuant to section 6672 of the Internal Revenue Code (“IRC”) of 1954, 26 U.S.C. § 6672 (1982), as a responsible person of the Denalco Corporation (“Denalco”) for the entire third quarter of 1981 and part of the fourth quarter of 1981.

On October 29, 1984, a delegate of the Secretary of the Treasury made an assessment against Mulee for a 100% penalty of $94,639.96 under the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Slodov v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Robert W. Monday v. United States of America, and Third-Party v. John A. Monday, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
  3. Waymon Leon Howard v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
  4. J. A. Newsome, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
  5. Feist v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1979

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Douglas A. Olsen v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1991
  2. Landau v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1988
  3. Peterson v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 1989
  4. Kelley v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1994
  5. Anderson v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API