Legal Opinion

Galberth v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided April 30, 1991No. 89-382 and 89-1008PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROGERS, Chief Judge:

In these consolidated appeals appellants Russell Galberth and Jay Taylor appeal their convictions on the ground that the trial court erred in denying their motions to suppress evidence that was discovered after they were stopped at police traffic roadblocks. 1 Guided by Supreme Court precedent, we balance the government interest served by the roadblocks against the liberty interests of the individuals seized. We therefore conclude that appellant Gal-berth’s conviction must be reversed, given Judge Dixon’s finding that the roadblock at which Galberth was stopped was…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  3. Delaware v. ProuseSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. United States v. Brignoni-PonceSupreme Court of the United States · 1975

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Mills v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2009
  2. Pueblo v. Yip BerríosSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1997
  3. State v. BinionCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1994
  4. Ex Parte JacksonSupreme Court of Alabama · 2004
  5. Minnick v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API