Legal Opinion

Minnick v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided May 5, 1992No. 90-CF-39PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TERRY, Associate Judge:

Appellant Minnick and a co-defendant, James Hayes, were charged with possession of phencyclidine (PCP) with intent to distribute it, in violation of D.C.Code § 33-541(a)(1) (1988). After the trial court denied her motion to suppress evidence, Min-nick was found guilty by the court in a stipulated trial. On appeal she challenges only the denial of her motion. We affirm.

I

On June 9, 1988, at about 7:00 p.m., Detectives Michael Keenan and Jeff Was-serman of the United States Park Police were sitting in an unmarked car in a restaurant parking lot at the corner of New York…

2Cases cited48 opinions

  1. Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Delaware v. ProuseSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  4. United States v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. United States v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. State v. MooreOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Bailey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2010
  3. State v. MooreOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Speight v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
  5. Mitchell v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2000

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API