Legal Opinion
Conzo v. City of New York
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided July 12, 2006No. 05 Civ. 705(MGC)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CEDARBAUM, District Judge.
Plaintiffs are 1478 current and former emergency medical technicians, paramedics, and related personnel in the Fire Department of the City of New York. They allege various violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. § 201 et seq. (the “FLSA”), and seek to proceed as a collective action under 29 U.S.C. § 216. Defendants move to dismiss, compel dispute resolution, and stay discovery. Defendants assert that this action may not proceed at this time because plaintiffs are required to exhaust administrative remedies under their collective bargaining…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Barrentine v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Wright v. Universal Maritime Service Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Frank A. Galli, Una G. Galli, John D. Yeager, Elizabeth M. Yeager v. James T. Metz, Jr., Kathleen M. MetzCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
- Susan Rogers v. New York UniversityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- Giles v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1999
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Hoops v. KEYSPAN ENERGYDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2011
- Hoops v. KEYSPAN ENERGYDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2011
- Freeman v. River Manor Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 2019