Legal Opinion

Schwartz v. Durham

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided June 20, 1938No. Civil No. 3953PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLockwood, J.

This is an appeal by Artina W. Schwartz, hereinafter called appellant, from a judgment in favor of M. H. Durham, hereinafter called appellee. The facts essential to a determination of this case are not in serious dispute, and may be stated as follows:

Appellant and appellee were married on November 12, 1919, and up to November, 1931, were husband and wife. During- their coverture they acquired certain community property, among it being a gasoline' filling-station in Tucson, Arizona, together with the various appurtenances thereto. In December, 1929, appellee entered into a contract with the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Tourette v. TouretteArizona Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Fox v. HirschfeldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1913
  3. Wadsworth v. WadsworthCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Williams v. WilliamsArizona Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Durham v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. of CaliforniaArizona Supreme Court · 1936

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Armer v. ArmerArizona Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Genda v. Superior Court, County of PimaArizona Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Spector v. SpectorArizona Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Marlin Ferris Goggans, Also Known as M. F. Goggans v. Reta OsbornCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956
  5. Hatch v. HatchArizona Supreme Court · 1976

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API