Legal Opinion
Dayton Development Co. v. Gilman Financial Services, Inc.
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided November 6, 2003No. CIV. 02-2962(RHK/AJB)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
KYLE, District Judge.
Introduction
This matter comes before the Court on cross-motions for summary judgment. Plaintiff Dayton Development Company (“Dayton”) has sued Gilman Financial Services, Inc. (“Gilman”) seeking to enforce a lease repurchase option for certain retail display fixtures. Dayton has moved for summary judgment on the ground that Gilman lacks standing to challenge a lease to which it is not a party. Gilman has filed a cross motion on the grounds that Dayton improperly calculated the price of the repurchase option as a matter of law. For the reasons…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Enterprise Bank v. Magna Bank of MissouriCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
- Get Away Club, Inc. v. Vic Coleman, Jim SnyderCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992
- Robert Mems Nathanial Khaliq James Logan Phillip Webb Thurman Smith Byron Brown v. City of St. Paul, Department of Fire and Safety ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2000
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Dayton Development Company, a Minnesota Corporation v. Gilman Financial Services, Inc., a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
- Dayton Development v. Gilman FinancialCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
- H & T Fair Hills, Ltd. v. Alliance Pipeline L.P.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2022