Legal Opinion

State v. . Golden

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 2, 1932PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStacy, C. J.

The appeal must be dismissed for the following reasons:

1. The transcript fails to show the organization of the court (S. v. May, 118 N. C., 1204, 24 S. E., 118), or that the “court was held by judge authorized to hold it, and at the time and place prescribed by law.” S. v. Butts, 91 N. C., 524.

2. No indictment against Euby Golden appears in the record. S. v. McDraughon, 168 N. C., 131, 83 S. E., 181. Only the one against Emmett Golden has been sent up.

It is the duty of appellant to see that the record is properly made up and transmitted. S. v. Frizell, 111 N. C., 722, 16 S. E., 409.

3. The…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Pruitt v. WoodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  2. Pruitt v. . WoodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  3. State v. . ButtsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1884
  4. Waters v. . WatersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  5. State v. . FrizellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1892

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. StricklandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  2. State v. BatdorfSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  3. State v. . GosnellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
  4. State v. StubbsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  5. State v. RickSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1995

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API