Legal Opinion

Key v. Chrysler Motors Corp.

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided February 13, 1995No. 14863PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

APODACA, Judge.

On the court’s own motion, the opinion filed on December 12,1994 is withdrawn and the following opinion is substituted in its place.

Chrysler Motor Company (Chrysler) appeals from a judgment awarding Jack Key and Jack Key Motor Company (Key) $300,-000 in damages under the New Mexico Motor Vehicle Dealers Franchising Act, NMSA 1978, Sections 57-16-1 through -16 (Repl. Pamp.1987 & Cum.Supp.1993) (the Act). Chrysler raises three issues on appeal; whether: (1) Key had standing to sue under the Act; (2) sufficient evidence existed to support the finding that Chrysler acted…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Helman v. GallegosNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Marquis v. Chrysler Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
  3. Hale v. Basin Motor Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Roberts v. General Motors Corp.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1994
  5. Gallegos v. Citizens Insurance AgencyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1989

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Key v. Chrysler Motors Corp.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Allsup's Convenience Stores, Inc. v. North River InsuranceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1998
  3. ASC Utah, Inc. v. Wolf Mountain Resorts, L.C.Utah Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Thoroughbred Ford, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1995
  5. Insure New Mexico, LLC v. McGonigleNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2000

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API