Roessler v. Security Savings & Loan Co.
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSohngen, J.
This case involves the construction of the term “fair cash value” as used in Section 8623-72, General Code, and the validity of an instruction to ap praisers appointed under that section as to what basis • they should use in determining “fair cash value.” That section provides, in part, that “if the court shall' find and order that such shareholder [dissenting shareholder] is entitled to be paid the fair cash value of any number of shares, the court shall appoint three appraisers to determine the fair cash value of such number of shares as of a day to be named in such order, * * * and said…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Chicago Corp. v. MundsCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1934
- Cole v. WellsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
- Adams v. United States Distributing Corp.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1945
- American General Corp. v. CampCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1937
- Winfree v. Riverside Cotton MillsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1912
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Armstrong v. Marathon Oil Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1987
- Robbins v. BeattySupreme Court of Iowa · 1954
- Martignette v. Sagamore Manufacturing Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1959
- Southdown, Inc. v. McGinnisNevada Supreme Court · 1973
- Vought v. Republic-Franklin InsuranceOhio Court of Appeals · 1963
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.