Legal Opinion

Martignette v. Sagamore Manufacturing Co.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided December 17, 1959PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWhittemore, J.

The plaintiffs, having voted their 564 shares of the common stock against the proposal, effective August 10, 1956, to consolidate their corporation with two other corporations, made demand upon the consolidated corporation, the defendant (Sagamore), within the statutory thirty day period (G. L. c. 156, § 46E) for payment for their shares. Failing agreement on the value, the plaintiffs and Sagamore each appointed an appraiser as the statute provides (G. L. c. 156, § 46E, by reference to § 46 1 ). The two appraisers could not agree on a third and the plaintiffs brought this bill of complaint…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Dickinson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  2. Silberschein v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  3. McAnarney v. Newark Fire InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
  4. Tri-Continental Corporation v. BattyeSupreme Court of Delaware · 1950
  5. New England Trust Co. v. AbbottMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1894

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Piemonte v. New Boston Garden Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
  2. Sarrouf v. New England Patriots Football Club, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1986
  3. Boston Safe Deposit & Trust Co. v. StoneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1965
  4. Morceau v. Gould-National Batteries, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1962
  5. Shear v. GabovitchMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1997

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API