Legal Opinion
Acosta v. Kraco, Inc.
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided April 3, 1984No. AT-7PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ZEHMER, Judge.
This workers’ compensation case presents another in a continuing series of challenges to the constitutionality of section 440.15(3)(b)3d, Florida Statutes (1979), which prohibits injured employees sixty-five years of age and older from receiving wage-loss benefits. This court previously upheld the validity of this statute against numerous constitutional challenges in Sasso v. Ram Property Management, 431 So.2d 204 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983), and O’Neil v. Dept. of Transportation, 442 So.2d 961 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983). Both of these decisions are presently under review by the Florida…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Sasso v. Ram Property ManagementDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
- Max Raskin, Robert H. Gollmar, Intervening-Plaintiff-Appellant v. J. Dennis Moran, Ken Timpel, and Charles P. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
- O'NEIL v. Department of Transp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
3Cited by3 opinions
- Ralston Purina Co. v. ByersDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
- Acosta v. Kraco, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1985
- Fruggiero v. Best Western Resort InnDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984