Legal Opinion

Acosta v. Kraco, Inc.

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided May 9, 1985No. 65214PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ALDERMAN, Justice.

We review the decision of the First District Court of Appeal in Acosta v. Kraco, Inc., 448 So.2d 562 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984), which certified the following question to be of great public importance:

Does Section 440.15(3)(b)3.d., Florida Statutes (1979) violate the supremacy clause of the United States Constitution because it conflicts with 42 U.S.C. Section 403(f)(3) (1983)?

448 So.2d at 564. In addition, petitioner has raised other challenges to the constitutionality of section 440.15(3)(b)3.d. We find no merit in these arguments. O’Neil v. Department of Transportation, 468…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Sasso v. Ram Property ManagementSupreme Court of Florida · 1984
  2. O'NEIL v. Department of Transp.Supreme Court of Florida · 1985
  3. Acosta v. Kraco, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Tobin's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997
  2. Jacobson v. Southeast Personnel Leasing, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API