Max Raskin, Robert H. Gollmar, Intervening-Plaintiff-Appellant v. J. Dennis Moran, Ken Timpel, and Charles P. Smith
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
CUDAHY, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiffs Max Raskin and Robert H. Gollmar appeal from an order dismissing their complaint and upholding the constitutionality of a Wisconsin statute which reduces the salary of certain “reserve” judges by an amount equal to any federal social security benefits received by these judges. On this appeal, plaintiff judges argue that the Wisconsin statute is void under the supremacy clause because it conflicts with federal law, that the state law impermissi-bly deprives them of property without just compensation in violation of due process and that the statute violates the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
- Hines v. DavidowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Rice v. Santa Fe Elevator Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Jones v. Rath Packing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Alessi v. Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Bernier v. BurrisIllinois Supreme Court · 1986
- Harris v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1993
- Sasso v. Ram Property ManagementDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
- Gorrie v. BowenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987
- State Ex Rel. Cannon v. MoranWisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.