Legal Opinion

Holt v. Rickett

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 8, 1977No. 54052PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Birdsong, Judge.

The appellant Holt brings this appeal from the findings, conclusions and judgment of the trial court wherein it ordered judgment in favor of appellee, Mrs. Rickett, based upon a promissory note. It is uncontested that by virtue of several transactions, Mrs. Rickett loaned Holt a total of $19,000. Holt executed a note for $10,000, which he readily admits. Some payments were made on the $19,000 indebtedness, but Holt conceded some amount of indebtedness remained. It is likewise uncontested that Holt’s attorney prepared the note and provided for the payment of ten percent…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Bank of Lumpkin v. Farmers State BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1926
  2. Strickland v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1959
  3. Bellerby v. GoodwynSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
  4. Loganville Banking Co. v. ForresterSupreme Court of Georgia · 1915
  5. Martin v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1890

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Eiberger v. WestSupreme Court of Georgia · 1981
  2. General Electric Credit Corp. v. BrooksSupreme Court of Georgia · 1978
  3. Vickers v. Chrysler Credit Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
  4. E. Phillip Duderwicz and Diana Duderwicz v. Sweetwater Savings Association, Ronald Rader and Zhanna Rader v. Sweetwater Savings AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
  5. Knight v. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1979

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API