Legal Opinion

Vickers v. Chrysler Credit Corp.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided April 15, 1981No. 61149PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Carley, Judge.

The pertinent facts in the instant appeal are as follows: For the purpose of financing its automobile inventory, Ray Dodge, Inc. (“Ray Dodge”) entered into a revolving loan agreement, commonly referred to as a “floor planning” arrangement, with plaintiff-appellee Chrysler Credit Corporation (“Chrysler”). As evidence of this *435agreement, Ray Dodge executed a “main” promissory note in the principal amount of $400,000 payable to Chrysler on demand. When Ray Dodge desired to purchase an automobile from the manufacturer, Chrysler would make Ray Dodge an advance in the amount of the…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Meade v. HeimansonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1977
  2. Vaughn & Co. v. SaulCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
  3. Dunlap v. Citizens & Southern DeKalb BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
  4. Gurwitch v. Luxurest Furniture Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1975
  5. Escambia Chemical Corp. v. RockerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1971

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Ford Motor Credit Co. v. LototskyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1982
  2. Zampatti v. Tradebank International Franchising Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
  3. McEntire v. Indiana National BankIndiana Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. Shawmut Worcester County Bank, N.A. v. MillerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1986
  5. Peterson v. Midas Realty Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1981

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API