Legal Opinion

Strickland v. Williams

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided June 5, 1959No. 20475PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Head, Justice.

1. The alleged notice that the intervenor “would enforce the provisions of'the said note . . . with regard to the payment of attorney’s fees” was given more than 60 days after the debtor (Parramore) had filed a voluntary petition for the liquidation of his assets and the payment of his debts through the appointment of a receiver. A temporary receiver was appointed on the same date the petition was filed.

A person who has been appointed receiver of the property of an insolvent debtor, by the order of a court of competent jurisdiction, becomes an executive officer of the court and…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Security Mortgage Co. v. PowersSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  2. Tindall v. NisbetSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
  3. Byrd v. ClarkSupreme Court of Georgia · 1930
  4. Sellers v. City of SummervilleSupreme Court of Georgia · 1951
  5. Stephens v. FulfordSupreme Court of Georgia · 1922

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. General Electric Credit Corp. v. BrooksSupreme Court of Georgia · 1978
  2. Holt v. RickettCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
  3. Core LaVista, LLC v. CummingCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2011
  4. In the Matter of Atlanta International Raceway, Inc., Bankrupt. Security National Bank v. Stacey W. Cotton, TrusteeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
  5. In Re Ridgewood Apartments of DeKalb County, Ltd.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 1994

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API